1 Introduction
In
[
, L. Carleson addressed a classical question regarding the convergence of Fourier series of continuous functions by proving their pointwise convergence almost everywhere, as stated below in Theorem 1.0.1.
Let be a complex valued, -periodic bounded Borel measurable function on the real line, and for an integer , define the Fourier coefficient as
Define the partial Fourier sum for as
Theorem
1.0.1
classical Carleson
Let be a -periodic complex-valued continuous function on . Then for almost all we have
where is the -th partial Fourier sum of defined in 1.0.2.
The purpose of this paper is twofold. On the one hand, it prepares computer verification of Theorem 1.0.1 by presenting a very detailed proof as a blueprint for coding in Lean. We pass through a bound for a generalization of the so-called Carleson operator to doubling metric measure spaces. This generalization is new, and proving these bounds constitutes the second purpose of this paper. This generalization incorporates several results from the recent literature, most prominently bounds for the polynomial Carleson operator of V. Lie
[
as well as its generalization
[
. A computer verification of our theorem will also entail a computer verification for the bulk of the work in these results.
We proceed to introduce the setup for our general theorem. We carry a multi purpose parameter, a natural number
in our notation that as it gets larger will allow more general applications but will worsen the constants in the estimates.
A doubling metric measure space is a complete and locally compact metric space equipped with a -finite non-zero Radon–Borel measure that satisfies the doubling condition that for all and all we have
where we have denoted by the open ball of radius centred at :
A collection of real valued continuous functions on the doubling metric measure space is called compatible, if there is a point where all the functions are equal to , and if there exists for each ball a metric on , such that the following five properties 1.0.7, 1.0.8, 1.0.9, 1.0.10, and 1.0.11 are satisfied. For every ball
For any two balls , in with and any ,
For any two balls in with and any
and for any two balls , with , and ,
For every ball in and every -ball of radius in , there is a collection of at most many -balls of radius covering , that is,
Further, a compatible collection is called cancellative, if for any ball in of radius , any Lipschitz function supported on , and any we have
where denotes the inhomogeneous Lipschitz norm on :
A one-sided Calderón–Zygmund kernel on the doubling metric measure space is a measurable function
such that for all with , we have
and if , then
where
Define the maximally truncated non-tangential singular integral associated with by
We define the generalized Carleson operator by
where .
Our main result is the following restricted weak type estimate for in the range , which by interpolation techniques recovers estimates for the open range .
Theorem
1.0.2
metric space Carleson
For all integers and real numbers the following holds. Let be a doubling metric measure space. Let be a cancellative compatible collection of functions and let be a one-sided Calderón–Zygmund kernel on . Assume that for every bounded measurable function on supported on a set of finite measure we have
where is defined in 1.0.16. Then for all Borel sets and in and all Borel functions with , we have, with defined in 1.0.17,
For a Borel function , and and define
and define further
Define further the linearized generalized Carleson operator by
where again .
Theorem
1.0.3
linearised metric Carleson
For all integers and real numbers the following holds. Let be a doubling metric measure space. Let be a cancellative compatible collection of functions. Let be a Borel function with finite range. Let be a one-sided Calderón–Zygmund kernel on . Assume that for every and every bounded measurable function on supported on a set of finite measure we have
where is defined in 1.0.21. Then for all bounded Borel sets and in and all Borel functions with , we have, with defined in 1.0.22,
We note that in Chapter ?? we formulate a variant of this theorem where has countable range.
In the one-dimensional Euclidean setting, with representing the Hilbert kernel:
and denoting the class of linear functions, the operator 1.0.17 is the classical Carleson operator, which plays a crucial role in proving the almost everywhere convergence of Fourier series
[
,
[
,
[
. The supremum in and is often omitted in classical treatments, but considering the maximal truncations can easily be reduced to the case without these truncations.
By replacing with the class of polynomials vanishing at up to some fixed but arbitrary degree, we obtain the polynomial Carleson operator of Lie
[
(quadratic case) and
[
. The case of the class of polynomials with vanishing linear coefficient is simpler and was estimated in
[
. The polynomial Carleson operator was generalized to the high-dimensional Euclidean setting in
[
for being a Calderón-Zygmund kernel with some Hölder regularity.
Doubling metric measure spaces are instances of spaces of homogeneous type. Indeed, by changing from a quasi-metric to an equivalent metric, every space of homogeneous type can be viewed as a doubling metric measure space (cf.
[
). Spaces of homogeneous type were introduced by
[
as a natural setting for Calderón-Zygmund theory. We refer to the textbook
[
for an account of these spaces.
Our concept of a compatible collection as a natural class of phase functions on a doubling metric measure space does not appear in
[
but is implicitly anticipated in
[
and subsequent work of
[
, who proves a Carleson-type theorem for the Malmquist-Takenaka series, which leads to classes of phases related to Blaschke products. A generalization of 1.0.17 from the previously mentioned Euclidean setting into the anisotropic setting that was suggested in
[
is included in our theory. The polynomial Carleson operator also plays a role in the study of maximally modulated singular Radon transforms along the parabola, see
[
and
[
.
For the proof of Theorem 1.0.2, we largely follow
[
, which in turn was inspired by
[
. We make suitable modifications to adapt to our more general setting and have made a few technical improvements in the proof. In particular, in Chapter 2, we explicitly divide the main work of the proof into mutually independent sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Some of these sections follow a similar pattern, starting with a subsection dividing the proof into further mutually independent subsections. This modularization of our proof was strongly endorsed in personal communication by the author of
[
.
Acknowledgement. L.B., F.v.D., R.S., and C.T. were funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy – EXC-2047/1 – 390685813. L.B. , R.S., and C.T. were also supported by SFB 1060. A.J. is funded by the TÜBITAK (Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye) under Grant Number 123F122.