2 Proof of Metric Space Carleson, overview
This section organizes the proof of Theorem 1.0.2 into sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. These sections are mutually independent except for referring to the statements formulated in the present section. Chapter 3 proves the main Theorem 1.0.2, while sections 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 each prove one proposition that is stated in the present section. The present section also introduces all definitions used across these sections.
Section 2.1 proves some auxiliary lemmas that are used in more than one of the sections 3-9.
Let \(a, q\) be given as in Theorem 1.0.2.
Define
and
Let \(\psi :{\mathbb {R}}\to {\mathbb {R}}\) be the unique compactly supported, piece-wise linear, continuous function with corners precisely at \(\frac1{4D}\), \(\frac1{2D}\), \(\frac14\) and \(\frac12\) which satisfies
for all \(x{\gt}0\). This function vanishes outside \([\frac1{4D},\frac12]\), is constant one on \([\frac1{2D},\frac14]\), and is Lipschitz with constant \(4D\).
Let a doubling metric measure space \((X,\rho ,\mu , a)\) be given. Let a cancellative compatible collection \({\Theta }\) of functions on \(X\) be given. Let \(o\in X\) be a point such that \({\vartheta }(o)=0\) for all \({\vartheta }\in {\Theta }\).
Let a Borel measurable function \({Q}:X\to {\Theta }\) with finite range be given. Let a one-sided Calderón–Zygmund kernel \(K\) on \(X\) be given so that for every \({\vartheta }\in {\Theta }\) the operator \(T_{{Q}}^{{\vartheta }}\) defined in 1.0.21 satisfies 1.0.23.
For \(s\in \mathbb {Z}\), we define
so that for each \(x, y \in X\) with \(x\neq y\) we have
In Chapter 3, we prove Theorem 1.0.2 and Theorem 1.0.3 from the finitary version, Proposition 2.0.1 below. Recall that a function from a measure space to a finite set is measurable if the pre-image of each of the elements in the range is measurable.
Let \({\sigma _1},\sigma _2\colon X\to \mathbb {Z}\) be measurable functions with finite range and \({\sigma _1}\leq \sigma _2\). Let \(F,G\) be bounded Borel sets in \(X\). Then there is a Borel set \(G'\) in \(X\) with \(2\mu (G')\leq \mu (G)\) such that for all Borel functions \(f:X\to {\mathbb {C}}\) with \(|f|\le \mathbf{1}_F\).
Let measurable functions \({\sigma _1}\leq \sigma _2\colon X\to \mathbb {Z}\) with finite range be given. Let bounded Borel sets \(F,G\) in \(X\) be given. Let \(S\) be the smallest integer such that the ranges of \(\sigma _1\) and \(\sigma _2\) are contained in \([-S,S]\) and \(F\) and \(G\) are contained in the ball \(B(o, \frac{1}{4}D^S)\).
In Chapter 4, we prove Proposition 2.0.1 using a bound for a dyadic model formulated in Proposition 2.0.2 below.
A grid structure \((\mathcal{D}, c, s)\) on \(X\) consists of a finite collection \(\mathcal{D}\) of pairs \((I, k)\) of Borel sets in \(X\) and integers \(k \in [-S, S]\), the projection \(s\colon \mathcal{D}\to [-S, S], (I, k) \mapsto k\) to the second component which is assumed to be surjective and called scale function, and a function \(c:\mathcal{D}\to X\) called center function such that the five properties 2.0.7, 2.0.8, 2.0.9, 2.0.10, and 2.0.11 hold. We call the elements of \(\mathcal{D}\) dyadic cubes. By abuse of notation, we will usually write just \(I\) for the cube \((I,k)\), and we will write \(I \subset J\) to mean that for two cubes \((I,k), (J, l) \in \mathcal{D}\) we have \(I \subset J\) and \(k \le l\).
For each dyadic cube \(I\) and each \(-S\le k{\lt}s(I)\) we have
Any two non-disjoint dyadic cubes \(I,J\) with \(s(I)\le s(J)\) satisfy
There exists a \(I_0 \in \mathcal{D}\) with \(s(I_0) = S\) and \(c(I_0) = o\) and for all cubes \(J \in \mathcal{D}\), we have
For any dyadic cube \(I\),
For any dyadic cube \(I\) and any \(t\) with \(tD^{s(I)} \ge D^{-S}\),
A tile structure \(({\mathfrak P},{\mathcal{I}},{\Omega },{\mathcal{Q}},{\mathrm{c}},{\mathrm{s}})\) for a given grid structure \((\mathcal{D}, c, s)\) is a finite set \({\mathfrak P}\) of elements called tiles with five maps
with \({\mathcal{I}}\) surjective and \(\mathcal{P}({\Theta })\) denoting the power set of \({\Theta }\) such that the five properties 2.0.13, 2.0.14, 2.0.15, 2.0.18, and 2.0.19 hold. For each dyadic cube \(I\), the restriction of the map \(\Omega \) to the set
is injective and we have the disjoint covering property (we use the union symbol with dot on top to denote a disjoint union)
For any tiles \({\mathfrak p},{\mathfrak q}\) with \({\mathcal{I}}({\mathfrak p})\subset {\mathcal{I}}({\mathfrak q})\) and \({\Omega }({\mathfrak p}) \cap {\Omega }({\mathfrak q}) \neq \emptyset \) we have
For each tile \({\mathfrak p}\),
where
and
We have for each tile \({\mathfrak p}\)
Let \((\mathcal{D}, c, s)\) be a grid structure and
a tile structure for this grid structure. Define for \({\mathfrak p}\in {\mathfrak P}\)
and
Then there exists a Borel set \(G'\) with \(2\mu (G') \leq \mu (G)\) such that for all Borel functions \(f:X\to {\mathbb {C}}\) with \(|f|\le \mathbf{1}_F\) we have
The proof of Proposition 2.0.2 is done in Chapter 5 by a reduction to two further propositions that we state below.
Fix a grid structure \((\mathcal{D}, c, s)\) and a tile structure \(({\mathfrak P},{\mathcal{I}},{\Omega },{\mathcal{Q}},{\mathrm{c}},{\mathrm{s}})\) for this grid structure.
We define the relation
on \({\mathfrak P}\times {\mathfrak P}\) meaning \({\mathcal{I}}({\mathfrak p})\subset {\mathcal{I}}({\mathfrak p}')\) and \(\Omega ({\mathfrak p}')\subset \Omega ({\mathfrak p})\). We further define for \(\lambda ,\lambda ' {\gt}0\) the relation
on \({\mathfrak P}\times {\mathfrak P}\) meaning \({\mathcal{I}}({\mathfrak p})\subset {\mathcal{I}}({\mathfrak p}')\) and
Define for a tile \({\mathfrak p}\) and \(\lambda {\gt}0\)
Given a subset \({\mathfrak P}'\) of \({\mathfrak P}\), we define \({\mathfrak P}({\mathfrak P}')\) to be the set of all \({\mathfrak p}\in {\mathfrak P}\) such that there exist \({\mathfrak p}' \in {\mathfrak P}'\) with \({\mathcal{I}}({\mathfrak p})\subset {\mathcal{I}}({\mathfrak p}')\). Define the densities
An antichain is a subset \(\mathfrak {A}\) of \({\mathfrak P}\) such that for any distinct \({\mathfrak p},{\mathfrak q}\in \mathfrak {A}\) we do not have have \({\mathfrak p}\le {\mathfrak q}\).
The following proposition is proved in Chapter 6.
For any antichain \(\mathfrak {A} \) and for all \(f:X\to {\mathbb {C}}\) with \(|f|\le \mathbf{1}_F\) and all \(g:X\to {\mathbb {C}}\) with \(|g| \le \mathbf{1}_G\)
Let \(n\ge 0\). An \(n\)-forest is a pair \(({\mathfrak U}, \mathfrak {T})\) where \({\mathfrak U}\) is a subset of \({\mathfrak P}\) and \(\mathfrak {T}\) is a map assigning to each \({\mathfrak u}\in {\mathfrak U}\) a nonempty set \({\mathfrak T}({\mathfrak u})\subset {\mathfrak P}\) called tree such that the following properties 2.0.32, 2.0.33, 2.0.34, 2.0.35, 2.0.36, and 2.0.37 hold.
For each \({\mathfrak u}\in {\mathfrak U}\) and each \({\mathfrak p}\in {\mathfrak T}({\mathfrak u})\) we have \({\mathcal{I}}({\mathfrak p}) \ne {\mathcal{I}}({\mathfrak u})\) and
For each \({\mathfrak u}\in {\mathfrak U}\) and each \({\mathfrak p},{\mathfrak p}''\in {\mathfrak T}({\mathfrak u})\) and \({\mathfrak p}'\in {\mathfrak P}\) we have
We have
We have for every \({\mathfrak u}\in {\mathfrak U}\)
We have for \({\mathfrak u}, {\mathfrak u}'\in {\mathfrak U}\) with \({\mathfrak u}\neq {\mathfrak u}'\) and \({\mathfrak p}\in {\mathfrak T}({\mathfrak u}')\) with \({\mathcal{I}}({\mathfrak p})\subset {\mathcal{I}}({\mathfrak u})\) that
We have for every \({\mathfrak u}\in {\mathfrak U}\) and \({\mathfrak p}\in {\mathfrak T}({\mathfrak u})\) that
The following proposition is proved in Chapter 7.
For any \(n\ge 0\) and any \(n\)-forest \(({\mathfrak U},{\mathfrak T})\) we have for all \(f: X \to \mathbb {C}\) with \(|f| \le \mathbf{1}_F\) and all bounded \(g\) with bounded support
Theorem 1.0.2 is formulated at the level of generality for general kernels satisfying the mere Hölder regularity condition 1.0.15. On the other hand, the cancellative condition 1.0.12 is a testing condition against more regular, namely Lipschitz functions. To bridge the gap, we follow [ to observe a variant of 1.0.12 that we formulate in the following proposition proved in Chapter 8.
Define
Define for any open ball \(B\) of radius \(R\) in \(X\) the \(L^\infty \)-normalized \(\tau \)-Hölder norm by
Let \(z\in X\) and \(R{\gt}0\) and set \(B=B(z,R)\). Let \(\varphi : X \to \mathbb {C}\) by supported on \(B\) and satisfy \(\| {\varphi }\| _{C^\tau (B)}{\lt}\infty \). Let \({\vartheta }, {\theta }\in {\Theta }\). Then
We further formulate a classical Vitali covering result and maximal function estimate that we need throughout several sections. This following proposition will typically be applied to the absolute value of a complex valued function and be proved in Chapter 9. By a ball \(B\) we mean a set \(B(x,r)\) with \(x\in X\) and \(r{\gt}0\) as defined in 1.0.6. For a finite collection \(\mathcal{B}\) of balls in \(X\) and \(1\le p{\lt} \infty \) define the measurable function \(M_{\mathcal{B},p}u\) on \(X\) by
Define further \(M_{\mathcal{B}}:=M_{\mathcal{B},1}\).
Let \(\mathcal{B}\) be a finite collection of balls in \(X\). If for some \(\lambda {\gt}0\) and some measurable function \(u:X\to [0,\infty )\) we have
for each \(B\in \mathcal{B}\), then
For every measurable function \(v\) and \(1\le p_1{\lt}p_2\) we have
Moreover, given any measurable bounded function \(w: X \to {\mathbb {C}}\) there exists a measurable function \(Mw: X \to [0, \infty )\) such that the following 2.0.45 and 2.0.46 hold. For each ball \(B \subset X\) and each \(x \in B\)
and for all \(1 \le p_1 {\lt} p_2 \le \infty \)
This completes the overview of the proof of Theorem 1.0.2.
2.1 Auxiliary lemmas
We close this section by recording some auxiliary lemmas about the objects defined in Chapter 2, which will be used in multiple sections to follow.
First, we record an estimate for the metrical entropy numbers of balls in the space \({\Theta }\) equipped with any of the metrics \(d_B\), following from the doubling property 1.0.11.
Let \(B' \subset X\) be a ball. Let \(r {\gt} 0\), \({\vartheta }\in {\Theta }\) and \(k \in \mathbb {N}\). Suppose that \(\mathcal{Z} \subset B_{B'}({\vartheta }, r2^k)\) satisfies that \(\{ B_{B'}(z,r)\mid z \in \mathcal{Z}\} \) is a collection of pairwise disjoint sets. Then
By applying property 1.0.11 \(k\) times, we obtain a collection \(\mathcal{Z}' \subset {\Theta }\) with \(|\mathcal{Z}'| = 2^{ka}\) and
Then each \(z \in \mathcal{Z}\) is contained in one of the balls \(B(z', \frac{r}{2})\), but by the separation assumption no such ball contains more than one element of \(\mathcal{Z}\). Thus \(|\mathcal{Z}| \le |\mathcal{Z}'| = 2^{ka}\).
The next lemma concerns monotonicity of the metrics \(d_{B(c(I), \frac14 D^{s(I)})}\) with respect to inclusion of cubes \(I\) in a grid.
Let \((\mathcal{D}, c, s)\) be a grid structure. Denote for cubes \(I \in \mathcal{D}\)
Let \(I, J \in \mathcal{D}\) with \(I \subset J\). Then for all \({\vartheta }, {\theta }\in {\Theta }\) we have
and if \(I \ne J\) then we have
If \(s(I) \ge s(J)\) then 2.0.8 and the assumption \(I\subset J\) imply \(I = J\). Then the lemma holds by reflexivity.
If \(s(J) \ge s(I)+1\), then using the monotonicity property 1.0.9, 2.0.1 and 1.0.10, we get
Using 2.0.10, together with the inclusion \(I \subset J\), we obtain
and consequently by the triangle inequality
Using this together with the monotonicity property 1.0.9 and 1.0.8 in 2.1.1, we obtain
This proves the second inequality claimed in the Lemma, from which the first follows since \(a \ge 4\) and hence \(2^{-95a} \le 1\).
We also record the following basic estimates for the kernels \(K_s\).
Let \(-S\le s\le S\) and \(x,y,y'\in X\). If \(K_s(x,y)\neq 0\), then we have
We have
and
By Definition 2.0.5, the function \(K_s\) is the product of \(K\) with a function which is supported in the set of all \(x,y\) satisfying 2.1.2. This proves 2.1.2.
Using 1.0.14 and the lower bound in 2.1.2 we obtain
Using \(D=2^{100a^2}\) and the doubling property 1.0.5 \(2 +100a^2\) times estimates the last display by
Using \(a\ge 4\) proves 2.1.3.
To prove 2.1.4 when \(2\rho (y,y') {\gt} \rho (x,y)\), use the lower bound in 2.1.2, \(2\rho (y,y') {\gt} \frac{1}{4}D^{s-1}\). Then 2.1.4 follows from the triangle inequality, 2.1.3 and \(a \ge 4\).
If \(2\rho (y,y') \le \rho (x,y)\), we rewrite \(|K_s(x,y)-K_s(x, y')|\) as
An upper bound for \(|K(x,y)-K(x, y')|\) is obtained similarly to the proof of 2.1.3, using 1.0.15 and the lower bound in 2.1.2
As above, this is estimated by
We have the trivial bound \(|\psi (D^{-s}\rho (x,y))| \leq 1\), and 2.1.6 provides a bound for \(|K(x,y)|\). Finally, we show that
by considering separately the cases \(\rho (y,y')/D^s \ge 1\) and \(\rho (y,y')/D^s {\lt} 1\). In the former case, the inequality is trivial; in the latter case, it follows from the fact that \(\psi \) is Lipschitz with constant \(4D\).
Combining the above bounds and using \(a\ge 4\) proves 2.1.4 in the case \(2\rho (y,y') \le \rho (x,y)\).