4 Distributions
Laurent Schwartz introduced the notion of distributions two talk about generalized solutions to differential equations. For his work he got the fields medal.
4.1 Space of Distributions
Definition
4.1
is the set of test functions together with a topology determined by its converging sequences : in if
Convention: if , then .
is the topological dual space, i.e. the space of continuous linear functionals with the weak-*-convergence, i.e. pointwise convergence.
Example
4.3
Every locally integrable function gives us a distribution defined by
which is well-defined because has compact support.
Example
4.4
Let be a Radon measure on (or more generally a signed Borel measure which is finite on compact subsets of ). Then it defines a distribution:
Proof
▶
As Borel sets are -measurable, every continuous function is -measurable. Let . Because and it follows that is -integrable. Linearity follows from linearity of the integral. If unifomrly, then for all and .
We have the following important special case:
4.1.1 Convolution
Notation
1
For define as and for we have the shift given by .
Proposition
4.7
Let . The following two distributions coincide:
The distribution determined by the smooth function .
The distribution .
We write this distribution as .
Proof
▶
The function is smooth :
It is continuous: If , then uniformly and the same holds for partial derivatives. Now is continuous hence is continuous and preserves the difference quotients, hence it will be also smooth.
The two distributions coincide:
Where we are allowed to pull out the integral by 4.8
Lemma
4.8
Let . Then for any we have
Proof
▶
Consider defined by
which is a finite sum as has compact support. Then for all one has a limit in
Hence by continuity of
Using the first definition we learn the following two things
Example
4.9
From the description 4.6: Writing is unambiguous.
Lemma
4.11
Convolution is continuous in both variables.
Proof
▶
Continuity in the distribution variable is clear by pointwise convergence.
For the continuity in the test function variable one uses that convolution with a fixed test function is a continuous function and distributions are continuous.
Proposition
4.12
There exists a sequence such that in .
Proof
▶
Fix some with . Define . Then
where we used that uniformly.
The following is how we view .
Corollary
4.13
Let such that . Then almost everywhere.
Proof
▶
We have in , hence almost everywhere.
Example
4.14
is not a function! I.e. its not of the form for some
Proof
▶
We have so if it would be a function, then it would be zero almost everywhere, hence 0. But this is a contradiction.
Proof
▶
We know by 4.12 that there exists in . Let be a distribution on . Now setting , yields pointwise
by 4.11 hence in .
4.1.2 Derivatives
For we have
This motivates the definition
Definition
4.16
For a multiindex and a distribution define the distribution
Proof
▶
First note, that holds in the case where is a test function, so that we have ordinary convolution. Then check pointwise. After erasing the sign
4.1.3 Support
The Support of a distribution is the complement of the largest open subset , such that . This definition is unambiguous: If vanishes on each for some index set and such that the compact set , we may assume that is finite and choose a partition of unity and . Then .
4.1.4 Tempered Distributions
We no enlarge our test space to the schwartz space consisting of smooth functions that are rapidly decreasing at with all derivatives.
Definition
4.19
Consider the increasing sequence of norms on defined by
with the obvious notion of convergence.
Lemma
4.20
We have a continuous inclusions , hence .
Moreover, this inclusion is dense. Hence being tempered is a property of distributions.
Lemma
4.21
Let such that there exists with
The distribution is tempered.
Example
4.22
This condition holds for functions in for
Lemma
4.23
If has compact support then it is tempered: Choose such that on some neighborhood . Then for all and defines a continuous functional on . It does not depend on the choice of , because given another such and any we have .
Let denote a tempered distribution.
Example
4.25
If , then is slowly increasing. The other formulation is still valid because is stable under .
What is the point of the Schwartz space?
Definition
4.26
The fourier transformation is a continuous bijection
So its easy to define a compatible generalization to the tempered distributions:
Definition
4.28
Define
and similarly for the inverse transform .
We automatically have the inversion theorem for distributions, because it holds for test functions.
Example
4.29
If denotes the constant function at , then
because
4.2 Fundamental solutions
In this chapter we may omit the . Fix a partial differential operator
with .
Definition
4.30
A fundamental solution of is a distribution such that
The reason why this is interesting:
Lemma
4.31
The operator
defines an inverse to
Proof
▶
because
Summing over gives
Now recall .
Definition
4.32
The characteristic polynomial of is
It is defined it such a way, that . So our hope is
The problem is, that the zeros of result in difficulties to define , even as a distribution.
4.2.1 Laplacian
If So which lies in for . To calculate our distribution the following is helpful
Theorem
4.33
For , Let be the tempered distribution associated to .
If then
with
Set . Hence we can find an appropriate constant such that is a fundamental solution, because . So writing out .
Proposition
4.34
If , the function is a fundamental solution of
Proof
▶
Sketch. One can actually compute for some constant , where is a distribution, that replaces the (non locally integrable) function in an appropriate way:
Notice, that on the complement of zero, this distribution coincides with .
Notation
2
If slowly increasing (i.e. all derivatives are bounded by polynomials), define as .
4.2.2 Heat operator
taken over i.e. we want to solve the homogeneous initial value problem
for some initial value .
We have
and this is obviously solved by . We may call this the heat kernel
Note that for , we have , hence , so solves the equation and in as .
Now define
is locally integrable on and it actually holds
so defines a tempered distribution by 4.21.
Theorem
4.36
is a fundamental solution of .
Proof
▶
Denote , then we have to see the last equation
Integration by parts
where in the last line we let □